The Promotion Algorithm

In partnership with

We've all witnessed this scenario: the high performer with exceptional results gets passed over for promotion while someone with decent but unremarkable performance advances to the next level. The difference rarely comes down to performance metrics. It comes down to psychological comfort with leadership potential.

I once watched a brilliant analyst get passed over three times for the same promotion. Her spreadsheets were flawless, her insights were sharp, and her work ethic was unmatched. But in every executive meeting, she'd start sentences with "I think maybe we should consider..." The person who got promoted? He opened with "Based on the data, we need to..." Same insight, different psychological impact on the executives.

After analyzing promotion patterns across different companies, I discovered that promotion decisions follow predictable psychological algorithms. Executives aren't consciously biased, but they're using mental shortcuts that have nothing to do with your quarterly reports.

Here's what really drives promotion decisions.

The Executive Decision Filter

When executives evaluate promotion candidates, their brains run a rapid psychological assessment. This mental algorithm evaluates three core questions in this exact order:

1. Leadership Readiness: "Do they think and communicate like someone at the next level?"
2. Risk Assessment: "Will promoting this person make me look good or create problems for me?"
3. Cultural Fit: "Do they match the leadership culture we're building?"

Performance reviews only matter if you pass these three unspoken gut checks first. Most high performers fail at step one because they're still communicating like individual contributors rather than future leaders.

The Language Trap That Kills Promotions